What is product liability?
Product liability is the part of injury law that deals with dangerous products. It lets an injured person sue the companies behind a defective product. The product can be almost anything: a pressure cooker, a car part, a hair relaxer, a weed killer.
The core idea is simple. A company that sells a defective product is responsible when the defect causes harm. You do not have to prove the company meant to hurt anyone or, in most cases, that it was careless.
This page covers the basics. The other pages go deeper:
This guide is general information. It is not legal advice. For advice on your own facts, speak with a lawyer.
The three types of product defect
Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute groups product defects into three types. Every product liability claim fits at least one of them.
| Defect type |
What went wrong |
Which units are affected |
Plain example |
| Design defect |
The plan for the product was unsafe |
Every unit made from that design |
A product works as intended but is unreasonably dangerous because of how it was designed |
| Manufacturing defect |
Something went wrong in production |
Only some units |
One batch leaves the factory with a flaw the other batches do not have |
| Failure to warn |
The instructions or warnings were missing or inadequate |
Every unit sold with that label |
A product carries a hidden danger that the label never mentions |
Design defects exist before anything is built. Cornell’s summary says a product may serve its purpose yet be “unreasonably dangerous to use due to a design flaw.” A trial in St. Louis that began on Sept. 29, 2026 rests on design-defect theories against Roundup’s maker.
Manufacturing defects happen on the production line. The design is fine, but some units come out flawed. That is why one person’s product fails while a neighbor’s identical product works.
Failure to warn is also called a marketing defect. It covers “improper instructions and failures to warn consumers of latent dangers in the product.” In Winckler v. Suzuki, a Florida jury awarded $20 million in a motorcycle front-brake failure-to-warn case. A Florida appeals court affirmed that verdict in April 2026.
Strict liability: what you have to prove
Most injury cases turn on negligence. In a negligence case, you must prove someone was careless. Product liability is different.
Cornell’s summary says product liability “is generally considered a strict liability offense.” A defendant is liable when the product is proven defective, “regardless of the defendant’s intent.” It does not matter if the company used great care. If a defect caused your harm, the company can still be liable.
In practice, a strict liability claim usually comes down to a few questions:
- Was the product defective in one of the three ways above?
- Did the defect cause your injury?
- Is the company you are suing responsible for the product?
- What harm did you suffer?
Each of these takes proof, so keep the product, your medical records and your receipts. The how-to-file page lists what to save. States apply these rules in different ways, so ask a lawyer how they work where you live.
Who can be sued
The company that made the product is the most common defendant. It is often not the only one. Cornell describes strict liability as applying when “an appropriate defendant holds responsibility” for the defective product.
Recent cases show the range of companies that get named:
- Brand owners and makers. The most-sued federal pressure cooker defendants include Instant Brands, Sunbeam (Crock-Pot), Tristar, SharkNinja, Sensio (Bella) and NuWave.
- Parts suppliers and automakers. In the ARC airbag MDL, the court ruled on motions from ARC, its suppliers and automakers in October 2026.
- Retailers. Johnson // Becker reports an undisclosed pressure cooker settlement involving Maxi-Matic USA and Kohl’s.
- Foreign makers. In June 2026, a Florida jury returned a $603 million verdict against China’s DTN, the maker of a counterfeit airbag inflator. NHTSA had ordered a recall of those inflators in April 2026.
Florida’s deadline statute shows how wide the chain can reach. It covers injury claims “founded on the design, manufacture, distribution, or sale of personal property.”
A lawyer can trace the chain from factory to store and name the right companies.
When a product claim may be blocked
Some claims face a federal barrier. On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Monsanto Co. v. Durnell. The Court ruled 7-2 that federal pesticide law (FIFRA) preempts state failure-to-warn claims that would require a cancer warning on an EPA-approved Roundup label.
That ruling was about warnings. It did not address other theories, such as design defect. It shows why the type of claim matters. A claim blocked under one theory may still go forward under another.
What is a product liability claim worth?
No one can give you a number in advance. The value depends on your injury, your costs, the strength of the proof, and your state’s laws.
These factors usually drive value:
| Factor |
Why it matters |
| How badly you were hurt |
Serious, lasting injuries lead to larger claims |
| Medical bills and lost pay |
These costs are the base of most claims |
| Strength of the defect proof |
Strong proof gives you leverage in talks |
| Punitive damages |
Some juries add damages to punish the company |
| State damages caps |
Some states cap awards after the verdict |
| Lawyer’s fee and costs |
These come out of the recovery |
Caps can change a result a lot. In Perez v. Sunbeam, a Colorado federal jury awarded $55.5 million in December 2024 over a Crock-Pot multi-cooker. In May 2025, the judge applied Colorado’s damages caps and reduced the award to about $9.1 million.
Many cases never reach a jury. A Law Street Media study counted 292 federal pressure cooker suits filed from 2019 to January 2024. Of the cases that had ended, most (133) settled out of court. Settlement amounts in these cases are usually confidential.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The settlements page walks through more published verdicts and how they changed after trial.
How fees affect what you keep
Most product injury lawyers work on contingency. You pay nothing up front. The lawyer takes a share of the recovery. According to Nolo, the fee in most personal injury cases is 33% to 40%, and one-third is most common.
The American Bar Association says a client who loses generally owes no fee. Expenses work differently. Whether costs come off before or after the lawyer’s percentage changes your net recovery. ABA Model Rule 1.5(c) says the agreement must be in writing, signed by you, and must explain how expenses are handled.
Deadlines: act early
Every state sets a deadline to sue. Miss it, and your claim can be lost for good. California and Texas allow 2 years for most injury suits. New York allows 3. Florida allows 4 for injury claims founded on a product’s design, manufacture, distribution or sale. Texas adds a 15-year limit measured from the product’s sale.
These rules vary by state and by type of claim. Check with a lawyer about the exact deadline in your state. The deadlines page has the full table and the exceptions.
Using the shortlist, step by step
This page lists five firms that take product injury cases. It is a starting point, not a ranking of quality. The order reflects our editorial view of fit for general product injury cases. Each firm’s public records show product liability work across the United States.
Each firm entry below shows its headquarters, fee terms, court-appointed roles and published results, with sources.
When you call a firm, ask these questions:
- Who will handle my case day to day? Ask for the lawyer’s name and office.
- Will my case stay with you? Mass tort cases are often referred to, or shared with, co-counsel.
- What is your fee, and how are expenses handled? Ask whether costs come off before or after the fee.
- What is my deadline? Ask the lawyer to confirm it in writing.
You can speak to more than one firm before you decide.
The firms on the shortlist
Schmidt & Clark represents injured people in individual cases, taking clients from anywhere in the United States. Its practice centres on mass torts, including defective products, medical devices, dangerous drugs and toxic exposure.
The firm takes Roundup, hair relaxer, airbag and pressure cooker cases, plus other defective products, from clients across the United States. In Texas, partner C.L. Mike Schmidt holds board certification in Personal Injury Trial Law.
- Main office
- Washington, DC
- Year started
- 2005
- How it charges
- Case reviews are free; phone line open 24/7
- Cases it advertises for
- Roundup, hair relaxer, airbags, pressure cookers, other defective products
Awards and credentials
- The firm says Best Lawyers placed it on the "Best Law Firms" list for 2026. Where this comes from
- C.L. Mike Schmidt, a partner, is board-certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in both Civil Trial Law and Personal Injury Trial Law, and by the National Board of Trial Advocacy in Civil Trial. Where this comes from
- According to the firm, Super Lawyers has selected it for 19 straight years. Where this comes from
Questions to raise
- Its website does not list dollar amounts for individual verdicts or settlements. Ask what results it has had in cases similar to yours.
- Referring mass tort cases to co-counsel is common. Ask if the firm would keep your case or pass it on.
Firm website: schmidtandclark.com
Morgan & Morgan is a national personal-injury firm based in Orlando. It was founded in 1988 and reports more than 1,100 attorneys working from about 140 offices.
Morgan & Morgan advertises general defective product cases as well as Roundup, hair relaxer and airbag claims.
- Main office
- Orlando, Florida
- Year started
- 1988
- How it charges
- Contingency ("The Fee Is Free Unless You Win")
- Cases it advertises for
- Roundup, hair relaxer, airbags, general defective products
Roles assigned by a court
- In the hair relaxer MDL (MDL 3060), Rene F. Rocha holds an appointed seat on the Plaintiffs' Executive Committee. Where this comes from
Outcomes the firm has published
- In June 2026, a Florida jury returned a $603 million award for the family of a woman killed when a counterfeit airbag inflator exploded. The defendant did not show up for trial. Where this comes from
- Winckler v. Suzuki: a jury awarded $20 million over motorcycle brakes, and an appeals court upheld the verdict in April 2026. Where this comes from
Questions to raise
- The firm has about 140 offices. Ask which lawyer, and which office, would work on your case each day.
Firm website: forthepeople.com
Beasley Allen is a plaintiffs' firm in Alabama. Former Lt. Gov. Jere Beasley founded it in 1979. The firm shares the lead in the ARC airbag MDL, holds a seat on the executive committee of the hair relaxer MDL, and has a long record of auto-defect cases.
Beasley Allen has litigated auto-defect cases for decades and also takes hair relaxer and Roundup cases.
- Main office
- Montgomery, Alabama
- Year started
- 1979
- How it charges
- Contingency ("No Win, No Fee or Case Costs")
- Cases it advertises for
- hair relaxer, Roundup, airbags (ARC and ZF-TRW)
Roles assigned by a court
- In March 2023, Demet Basar was named co-lead counsel in the ARC airbag inflator MDL (MDL 3051, N.D. Ga.). Where this comes from
- Navan Ward holds a seat on the Plaintiffs' Executive Committee in MDL 3060, the hair relaxer MDL. Where this comes from
- In the ZF-TRW airbag control unit MDL (C.D. Cal.), Dee Miles was named to the plaintiffs' steering committee. Where this comes from
Outcomes the firm has published
- The firm reports a $162 million settlement in a case over a 2021 van crash in which the tires had the wrong load range. Where this comes from
Questions to raise
- In March 2026, Beasley Allen said it was still reviewing new Roundup cases.
Firm website: beasleyallen.com
Johnson // Becker is a product-liability firm in St. Paul. It represents plaintiffs in the majority of federal pressure cooker injury cases, and its lawyers hold leadership roles in the hair relaxer, Suboxone and infant formula MDLs.
Johnson // Becker also advertises general product liability cases and sits on the hair relaxer MDL executive committee.
- Main office
- St. Paul, Minnesota
- How it charges
- Contingency: it charges no fees or costs unless it recovers money
- Cases it advertises for
- pressure cookers, hair relaxer, general product liability
Roles assigned by a court
- In MDL 3060, the hair relaxer MDL, Timothy J. Becker holds a seat on the Plaintiffs' Executive Committee. Where this comes from
- In March 2024, Timothy J. Becker was named one of four co-lead counsel in MDL 3092, the Suboxone film MDL (N.D. Ohio). Where this comes from
Outcomes the firm has published
- A Law Street Media analysis found the firm represented plaintiffs in 61% of the 292 federal pressure cooker suits filed between 2019 and January 2024. Where this comes from
Questions to raise
- The firm does not list pressure cooker verdict amounts. Its cases usually settle on confidential terms.
Firm website: johnsonbecker.com
Lieff Cabraser is a class-action and mass-tort firm in San Francisco, founded in 1972. Its lawyers hold leadership roles in the Takata, ARC and ZF-TRW airbag cases and in the hair relaxer MDL.
Lieff Cabraser handles both class actions and mass torts, which matters if your product is the subject of a recall or a large group case.
- Main office
- San Francisco, California
- Year started
- 1972
- How it charges
- Its About page does not state a fee
- Cases it advertises for
- hair relaxer, airbags (Takata, ARC, ZF-TRW)
Roles assigned by a court
- A court appointed David Stellings co-lead counsel in both the ARC airbag MDL (Atlanta) and the ZF-TRW airbag MDL (Los Angeles). He is part of the Takata MDL 2599 leadership too. Where this comes from
- In MDL 3060, the hair relaxer MDL, Kelly M. Dermody holds a seat on the Plaintiffs' Executive Committee. Where this comes from
Outcomes the firm has published
- Economic-loss settlements in the Takata airbag cases with Honda, Toyota, Ford, Nissan, BMW, Subaru and Mazda, adding up to more than $1.5 billion. Where this comes from
- Mraz v. DaimlerChrysler: the firm reports a $54.4 million verdict against the automaker for not fixing a known defect that caused a death. Where this comes from
Questions to raise
- A large share of its airbag work is class litigation over economic loss. Find out how it approaches a single person's injury claim.
Firm website: lieffcabraser.com
Each outcome above comes from the firm's own published record or from court filings. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.